Drake Bulldogs @ Creighton Bluejays
5-11, 0-4 MVC
69
5-11, 0-4 MVC
7-8, 2-2 MVC
73
7-8, 2-2 MVC
Drake Bulldogs
starters |
bench |
team |
MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | OREB | DREB | PF |
MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | OREB | DREB | PF |
| 8 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| 7 | 6 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| 6 | 3 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 9 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| 28 | 8 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| 9 | 4 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 10 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 15 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| 30 | 8 | 3-11 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 36 | 14 | 4-12 | 2-7 | 4-4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
69 | 22-57 | 8-24 | 17-19 | 38 | 13 | 14 | 8 | 1 | 14 | 24 | 20 | |
39% | 33% | 89% |
Creighton Bluejays
starters |
bench |
team |
MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | OREB | DREB | PF |
MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | OREB | DREB | PF |
| 15 | 9 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| 11 | 3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| 25 | 17 | 6-10 | 1-1 | 4-7 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| 25 | 10 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 6 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| 27 | 17 | 8-11 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 3 |
| 6 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 19 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 6 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 4 | 1-9 | 0-4 | 2-3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 19 | 7 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 5-6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
73 | 25-54 | 7-23 | 16-23 | 34 | 19 | 15 | 5 | 4 | 11 | 23 | 19 | |
46% | 30% | 70% |
Game Information
Omaha, NE
2025-26 Standings
NCAA Division I
| Missouri Valley Conference | CONF | GB | OVR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belmont | 16-4 | - | 26-6 |
| Bradley | 13-7 | 3 | 21-13 |
| Illinois State | 12-8 | 4 | 23-13 |
| Murray State | 12-8 | 4 | 20-13 |
| UIC | 12-8 | 4 | 19-16 |
| Northern Iowa | 11-9 | 5 | 23-13 |
| Valparaiso | 11-9 | 5 | 18-15 |
| Southern Illinois | 10-10 | 6 | 16-16 |
| Drake | 6-14 | 10 | 14-20 |
| Indiana State | 4-16 | 12 | 11-21 |
| Evansville | 3-17 | 13 | 7-25 |
| Big East Conference | CONF | GB | OVR |
|---|---|---|---|
| St. John's | 18-2 | - | 30-7 |
| UConn | 17-3 | 1 | 34-6 |
| Villanova | 15-5 | 3 | 24-9 |
| Seton Hall | 10-10 | 8 | 21-12 |
| Creighton | 9-11 | 9 | 16-18 |
| DePaul | 8-12 | 10 | 16-16 |
| Butler | 7-13 | 11 | 16-16 |
| Providence | 7-13 | 11 | 15-18 |
| Marquette | 7-13 | 11 | 12-20 |
| Georgetown | 6-14 | 12 | 16-18 |
| Xavier | 6-14 | 12 | 15-18 |
Men's College Basketball News
Why Jay Williams hates NCAA tournament expansion to 76 teams
Jay Williams breaks down why he dislikes the expansion of the NCAA tournament to 76 teams.
15m
Men's college basketball transfer portal live: Tracking news, updates
The latest news and updates for players entering -- and exiting -- the transfer portal for the 2026-27 season.
1h
Which men's and women's basketball teams would NCAA tournament expansion benefit?
Here's why expanding the fields to 76 teams benefits power conferences -- and which teams would make the cut.
2h